From simplification to sh!tification

Dear Deidre,

I’m writing to you in utter frustration about the state of our technology department at the news publishing site where I work. What was once a functional, albeit imperfect, system has been completely destroyed by a recent migration that was supposed to “simplify” everything. Instead, it’s turned into a textbook case of sh!tification.

The original aim was admirable enough: streamline processes and improve efficiency. However, the reality couldn’t be further from this promise. Every single process that used to take a few minutes is now a labyrinth of convoluted steps and functionality that seems designed to make life harder. Tasks that were once straightforward are now long-winded, nonsensical, and borderline impossible.

To make matters even worse, testing—something that should be a crucial part of any migration—has become a nightmare. The tools and systems we’re now forced to use make testing far more complicated than it ever was before. Where once we could quickly check and validate processes, we’re now stuck jumping through endless hoops just to ensure basic functionality. It’s like trying to test a car by assembling it blindfolded, only for it to fall apart the moment you hit the road.

The worst part is that this entire migration was rushed through because the business set an arbitrary deadline. Instead of pushing back and ensuring things were done properly, the team responsible simply nodded along like a flock of yes-men. It feels like no one had the courage to challenge the timeline or point out that the plan was flawed from the outset. They just said “yes” because that’s what they always do, and now we’re all paying the price for their inability to stand up to the higher-ups.

The fallout has been catastrophic, staff morale is at rock bottom, and the tools we’ve been given are so counterintuitive that even the most tech-savvy among us are struggling. It’s as though someone decided to fix a minor leak in the roof by tearing the entire building down and handing us some duct tape to rebuild it.

I don’t know how much longer I can endure this chaos. The entire department is drowning in frustration, and no one seems to be taking responsibility for the mess. Is there any way to salvage this situation, or are we doomed to wade through this quagmire of sh!tification forever?

Yours sincerely,

Frustrated and Fed Up

Dear Frustrated and Fed Up,

It sounds like your department has been thrown into absolute chaos, and I can completely understand your frustration. What you’re describing—processes becoming unnecessarily complicated, rushed deadlines, and testing being a nightmare—points to a classic case of poor project management and a lack of clear communication.

The root of the problem seems to lie in the culture of “yes-men” you mentioned. When people are too afraid to challenge unrealistic deadlines or flawed plans, the result is often a disaster like the one you’re facing now. Without proper planning, testing, and feedback, simplification can quickly spiral into sh!tification, as you so aptly put it.

Unfortunately, fixing this mess will require more than duct tape. Here are some steps you might consider raising with your team or leadership:

  1. Push for a Post-Migration Review: Suggest a formal review of the migration process, highlighting the pain points and inefficiencies. This can be a chance to identify what went wrong and push for improvements.
  2. Advocate for Proper Testing Protocols: Testing should never be an afterthought. Propose creating a dedicated testing phase and tools that simplify validation processes rather than complicating them further.
  3. Encourage Open Communication: The culture of saying “yes” to everything needs to change. Encourage your colleagues to voice concerns and provide honest feedback to leadership. Perhaps even suggest a dedicated forum where staff can share their frustrations and ideas to improve workflows.
  4. Push Back on Unrealistic Deadlines: If leadership sets another arbitrary deadline for future projects, work with your team to present a realistic timeline and explain the risks of rushing through critical steps.
  5. Find Allies in Leadership: If you can identify someone higher up who is open to change and improvement, share your concerns with them. Sometimes it takes one person to champion a better way of doing things for the message to be heard.

It might take time to untangle the mess, but remember that you’re not alone in feeling this way. Many of your colleagues are likely just as frustrated, and together you can start advocating for the changes needed to make your department functional again.

The key is to ensure that lessons are learned from this situation—don’t let it happen again. If leadership refuses to listen or take action, it may be worth considering whether this workplace is the right fit for you long-term.

All the best,
Deidre

Published

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *